Transparency and Accountability in Public Procurement
N. O. Chibundu, B. U. Dike, U. Chris-Ejiogu
Pages 14-23 Read ArticleA scholarly platform for interdisciplinary research in governance, procurement, sustainability, education, development studies, environmental management, logistics, and the wider social sciences.
Manuscripts pass through editorial screening, similarity checks, and peer-review evaluation before publication. This keeps the journal focused on originality, clarity, citation quality, and academic contribution.
Volume 3, Issue 1 (2026)
N. O. Chibundu, B. U. Dike, U. Chris-Ejiogu
Pages 14-23 Read ArticleMohammed G. Yusuf et al.
Pages 35-49 Read ArticleEssor Gospel Chisa, Mercy Douglas
Pages 186-193 Read ArticleAJSS is guided by scholars and researchers committed to rigorous peer review, ethical publication practice, and credible social science communication.
View Editorial BoardAJSS maintains strict publication ethics, double-blind peer review, originality checks, conflict-of-interest disclosure, and responsible scholarly publishing standards.
Authors should prepare manuscripts according to AJSS formatting, citation, originality, abstract, keywords, and submission requirements.
Stanley Okechukwu Orisakwe; Babatunde Godfavour Olayemi; Peace Ijeoma Ejieji - Ezeibe
Civil-military relations in Nigeria have historically oscillated between cooperation and confrontation, often producing tension in public administration and governance. This paper examines the civil- military power tussle and the quest for supremacy in Nigerian public administration, highlighting how competition for authority has sometimes manifested as reckless decision-making and policy instability. Anchored in Bureaucratic Theory and Civil-Military Relations Theory, the study conceptualizes the military and civilian institutions as distinct centers of power whose interactions shape governance outcomes, institutional accountability, and state effectiveness. Using qualitative approach, including documentary analysis, government reports, media accounts, and expert interviews, the study argues that episodes of recklessness in administration often emerge when either civil or military actors attempt to assert dominance over policy processes, resource allocation, or institutional oversight. Findings reveal that such struggles result in weakened bureaucratic efficiency, politicization of administrative structures, erosion of public trust, and ad hoc policy implementation. The study further indicates that the lack of clear constitutional enforcement, inadequate institutional checks, and historical legacies of military intervention perpetuate cycles of conflict and governance unpredictability. The paper recommends establishing clearly codified boundaries of authority, institutionalized civilian oversight mechanisms, and professional capacity-building for both civil and military administrators to foster mutual respect and reduce recklessness. Strengthening inter- institutional communication, adherence to rule-based administrative procedures, and legal enforcement of civil supremacy are critical for ensuring stability, accountability, and sustainable governance in Nigeria.
Stanley Okechukwu Orisakwe; Babatunde Godfavour Olayemi; Peace Ijeoma Ejieji - Ezeibe (2026). CIVIL - MILITARY POWER TUSSLE AND SHOW FOR SUPERIORITY: A STUDY OF RECKLESSNESS IN NIGERIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION . Alvan Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 320-335. https://doi.org/10.67638/ajss-2026-v3-i2-026
Stay updated on our news and events! Sign up to receive our newsletter.