Transparency and Accountability in Public Procurement
N. O. Chibundu, B. U. Dike, U. Chris-Ejiogu
Pages 14-23 Read ArticleA scholarly platform for interdisciplinary research in governance, procurement, sustainability, education, development studies, environmental management, logistics, and the wider social sciences.
Manuscripts pass through editorial screening, similarity checks, and peer-review evaluation before publication. This keeps the journal focused on originality, clarity, citation quality, and academic contribution.
Volume 3, Issue 1 (2026)
N. O. Chibundu, B. U. Dike, U. Chris-Ejiogu
Pages 14-23 Read ArticleMohammed G. Yusuf et al.
Pages 35-49 Read ArticleEssor Gospel Chisa, Mercy Douglas
Pages 186-193 Read ArticleAJSS is guided by scholars and researchers committed to rigorous peer review, ethical publication practice, and credible social science communication.
View Editorial BoardAJSS maintains strict publication ethics, double-blind peer review, originality checks, conflict-of-interest disclosure, and responsible scholarly publishing standards.
Authors should prepare manuscripts according to AJSS formatting, citation, originality, abstract, keywords, and submission requirements.
Research article examining transparency, donor oversight and procurement accountability among international development organisations in Nigeria.
Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria
Transparency and accountability have become indispensable principles for ensuring efficiency, fairness, and credibility in public procurement. Procurement functions play a central role in achieving project outcomes and maintaining donor trust. Yet persistent concerns about opaque procedures, weak oversight, and inconsistent implementation of global standards have raised questions about procurement integrity. This study examines the interplay between transparency, accountability, institutional capacity, and donor compliance in the procurement systems of international development organisations operating in Nigeria. The research uses quantitative survey analysis to provide a comprehensive staff and governance assessment. Findings indicate that 60.0% of respondents strongly agreed that donor oversight improves transparency and accountability, while 72.0% strongly agreed that leadership and management commitment strongly influences transparency. A further 61.3% strongly agreed on the significant contribution of staff competence, training, and ethics. The findings show that structured transparency mechanisms and donor oversight significantly enhance procurement accountability, although institutional capacity constraints moderate implementation effectiveness. The study contributes to procurement governance literature by presenting an integrated analytical framework linking governance variables within a developing-country context.
Chibundu, N. O., Dike, B. U., & Chris-Ejiogu, U. (2026). Transparency and accountability in public procurement: Practices of some international development organisations in Nigeria. Alvan Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 14–23. DOI: Pending Crossref registration.
Stay updated on our news and events! Sign up to receive our newsletter.